“ADR and Lok Adalats: Reducing Case Backlogs and Ensuring Justice”
Context

- Recently, the Minister of Law and Justice reaffirmed the government’s commitment to legal reforms rooted in India’s civilisational ethos.
- Focus has been placed on strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms to ensure faster, cost-effective, and socially inclusive justice.
- This move comes amid rising case pendency, interstate disparities, and the urgent need for efficient justice delivery in India.
1. What is ADR?
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to methods for resolving disputes outside formal court proceedings.
- Benefits:
- Less expensive than traditional litigation.
- Faster resolution of disputes.
- Flexible, allowing tailored solutions.
- Types of ADR:
- Arbitration
- Mediation
- Conciliation
- Lok Adalats (Judicial settlements)
2. Basis of ADR
Constitutional Basis:
- Enshrined in Article 39A, which mandates the state to provide equal justice and free legal aid.
Legal and Procedural Basis:
- Code of Civil Procedure, Section 89 (1908): Recognises ADR methods such as arbitration, conciliation, mediation, and judicial settlement.
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (amended 2021): Resolves civil and compoundable criminal disputes (e.g., theft, trespass, adultery) through binding awards.
- Arbitration Act, 2021:
- Establishes the Indian Arbitration Council.
- Sets a maximum 180-day timeline for dispute resolution.
- Mediation flexibility: Dissatisfied parties can exit after two sessions, ensuring voluntary participation.
Impact:
- Pre-litigation mediation reduces case backlog rather than adding to it.
3. How do Lok Adalats Function?
Legal Framework:
- Governed by the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, inspired by Article 39A.
Types of Lok Adalats:
- Permanent Lok Adalat (Section 22-B)
- National Lok Adalat
- e-Lok Adalat
Key Features:
- First Lok Adalat was held in Gujarat in 1999.
- Decisions are final and binding, with no appeal as disputes are resolved pre-litigation.
- Dissatisfied parties can still approach regular courts, preventing absolute authority.
4. Importance of Strengthening ADR
- Tool for Social Change:
- Promotes dispute resolution aligned with constitutional values.
- Facilitates dialogue and exchange of views.
- Ensures True Justice:
- Solutions reflect parties’ terms, language, and sentiments.
- Protects social and personal interests.
- Strengthens Interpersonal Relationships:
- Encourages interaction and cooperation at social level.
- Addresses Interstate Disparities:
- India Justice Report:
- Pending cases exceed 5 crore.
- High Courts and district courts face 33% and 21% vacancy rates.
- Judges in Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, and Kerala have workloads > 4,000 cases.
- India Justice Report:
- Reduces Case Pendency:
- Many cases in courts pending for over 10 years.
- National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) Statistics:
- Total pending cases in India: 4,57,96,239
- Supreme Court: 81,768
- High Courts: ~62.9 lakh
- Challenges Highlighted:
- India Justice Report 2025 notes delays, access issues, and accountability challenges.
- States with high pendency: Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar.
- Strengthening ADR is essential for rapid, per capita justice delivery.
Conclusion
- The Law Ministry emphasized ADR through the doctrine of Panch Parmeshwar, promoting collective consensus in dispute resolution.
- Encourages global cooperation to strengthen ADR mechanisms.
- Strengthening ADR ensures faster, cost-effective, socially inclusive justice, addressing the backlog of cases, and enhancing overall access to justice in India.
Source : The Hindu