“ADR and Lok Adalats: Reducing Case Backlogs and Ensuring Justice”

Context

  • Recently, the Minister of Law and Justice reaffirmed the government’s commitment to legal reforms rooted in India’s civilisational ethos.
  • Focus has been placed on strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms to ensure faster, cost-effective, and socially inclusive justice.
  • This move comes amid rising case pendency, interstate disparities, and the urgent need for efficient justice delivery in India.

1. What is ADR?

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to methods for resolving disputes outside formal court proceedings.
  • Benefits:
    • Less expensive than traditional litigation.
    • Faster resolution of disputes.
    • Flexible, allowing tailored solutions.
  • Types of ADR:
    • Arbitration
    • Mediation
    • Conciliation
    • Lok Adalats (Judicial settlements)

2. Basis of ADR

Constitutional Basis:

  • Enshrined in Article 39A, which mandates the state to provide equal justice and free legal aid.

Legal and Procedural Basis:

  • Code of Civil Procedure, Section 89 (1908): Recognises ADR methods such as arbitration, conciliation, mediation, and judicial settlement.
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (amended 2021): Resolves civil and compoundable criminal disputes (e.g., theft, trespass, adultery) through binding awards.
  • Arbitration Act, 2021:
    • Establishes the Indian Arbitration Council.
    • Sets a maximum 180-day timeline for dispute resolution.
  • Mediation flexibility: Dissatisfied parties can exit after two sessions, ensuring voluntary participation.

Impact:

  • Pre-litigation mediation reduces case backlog rather than adding to it.

3. How do Lok Adalats Function?

Legal Framework:

  • Governed by the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, inspired by Article 39A.

Types of Lok Adalats:

  • Permanent Lok Adalat (Section 22-B)
  • National Lok Adalat
  • e-Lok Adalat

Key Features:

  • First Lok Adalat was held in Gujarat in 1999.
  • Decisions are final and binding, with no appeal as disputes are resolved pre-litigation.
  • Dissatisfied parties can still approach regular courts, preventing absolute authority.

4. Importance of Strengthening ADR

  • Tool for Social Change:
    • Promotes dispute resolution aligned with constitutional values.
    • Facilitates dialogue and exchange of views.
  • Ensures True Justice:
    • Solutions reflect parties’ terms, language, and sentiments.
    • Protects social and personal interests.
  • Strengthens Interpersonal Relationships:
    • Encourages interaction and cooperation at social level.
  • Addresses Interstate Disparities:
    • India Justice Report:
      • Pending cases exceed 5 crore.
      • High Courts and district courts face 33% and 21% vacancy rates.
      • Judges in Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, and Kerala have workloads > 4,000 cases.
  • Reduces Case Pendency:
    • Many cases in courts pending for over 10 years.
    • National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) Statistics:
      • Total pending cases in India: 4,57,96,239
      • Supreme Court: 81,768
      • High Courts: ~62.9 lakh
  • Challenges Highlighted:
    • India Justice Report 2025 notes delays, access issues, and accountability challenges.
    • States with high pendency: Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar.
    • Strengthening ADR is essential for rapid, per capita justice delivery.

Conclusion

  • The Law Ministry emphasized ADR through the doctrine of Panch Parmeshwar, promoting collective consensus in dispute resolution.
  • Encourages global cooperation to strengthen ADR mechanisms.
  • Strengthening ADR ensures faster, cost-effective, socially inclusive justice, addressing the backlog of cases, and enhancing overall access to justice in India.

Source : The Hindu

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top